tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-949848423664896972.post3377092495353405230..comments2023-05-19T04:33:54.012-07:00Comments on deconstruction: Possible Archive SpreadsJamie Kripkehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16044632872399904626noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-949848423664896972.post-81693714381118534762008-09-05T14:10:00.000-07:002008-09-05T14:10:00.000-07:00Actually I would like to see one with the pyramid ...Actually I would like to see one with the pyramid on the left and the walkway on the right. Besides that #5 would be my choice. Nice images.Yvonne Boydhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07914397832293580827noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-949848423664896972.post-40559962385473152982008-09-04T19:06:00.000-07:002008-09-04T19:06:00.000-07:00three (pyramid) - humor is relative to your styleo...three (pyramid) - humor is relative to your style<BR/>or<BR/>five (chair) - mood is just fantastic<BR/><BR/>nice.wannabehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16105027460016529410noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-949848423664896972.post-48709270716747698152008-09-04T08:26:00.000-07:002008-09-04T08:26:00.000-07:00I think Five works best - the similar pallete and ...I think Five works best - the similar pallete and mood work really well together, and the subject matter seems to match quite nicely.<BR/><BR/>Two's not working for me because they're different (close in vs out, narrow lighting) but not different enough (portraits, chinese people).<BR/><BR/>One, that walkway shot is awesome but I can't see how these two images support each other.<BR/><BR/>Three and Four are better pairings than two, but have basically the same dynamic as Two.<BR/><BR/>Not that you asked!Rob Prideauxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04117285716886529856noreply@blogger.com